🔗 Share this article

For months, intimidating phone calls recurred. Initially, reportedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, subsequently from the police themselves. Ultimately, one resident states he was called to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or face serious consequences.

The leather artisan is part of a group fighting a expensive project where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – faces razed and transformed by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of the slum is unparalleled in the planet," explains the protester. "But the plan aims to dismantle our community and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The dank gullies of this community stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Homes are constructed informally and frequently without proper sanitation, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the air is saturated with the overpowering odor of exposed drainage.

To some, the vision of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of luxury high-rises, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and homes with two toilets is an optimistic future come true.

"We don't have sufficient health services, proper streets or water management and we have no places for children to play," states A Selvin Nadar, 56, who migrated from his home state in that period. "The single option is to clear the area and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, like the leather artisan, are opposing the redevelopment.

None deny that Dharavi, long neglected as informal housing, is in stark need economic input and modernization. But they are concerned that this initiative – without resident participation – might transform a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into an elite enclave, forcing out the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have resided there since the nineteenth century.

This involved these marginalized, relocated individuals who built up the vacant wetlands into a frequently examined example of community resilience and commercial output, whose production is valued at between a significant amount and $2m annually, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Relocation Worries

Of the roughly 1 million inhabitants living in the crowded sprawling neighborhood, less than 50% will be able for new homes in the project, which is estimated to take a significant period to complete. Additional residents will be moved to undeveloped zones and coastal regions on the far outskirts of the metropolis, potentially break up a generations-old social network. Certain individuals will not get housing at all.

Residents permitted to continue living in the area will be given apartments in tower blocks, a major break from the natural, collective approach of residing and operating that has supported the community for so long.

Businesses from tailoring to clay work and waste processing are expected to shrink in number and be transferred to a specific "business area" separated from homes.

Existential Threat

For those such as the leather artisan, a craftsman and third generation inhabitant to live in this community, the project presents an existential threat. His informal, multi-level facility creates leather coats – tailored coats, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – marketed in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and abroad.

His family dwells in the spaces underneath and his workers and garment workers – workers from different regions – reside in the same building, permitting him to sustain operations. Outside the slum, accommodation prices are frequently significantly as high for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

Within the government offices close by, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project depicts an alternative outlook. Fashionable inhabitants mill about on cycles and e-vehicles, acquiring western-style bread and breakfast items and socializing on a terrace near a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This represents a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar morning meal and low-cost tea that maintains local residents.

"This is not progress for our community," says the protester. "It's an enormous property transaction that will make it unaffordable for residents to remain."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the development company. Run by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and a supporter of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

Even as local authorities describes it as a collaborative effort, the developer paid nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the project was questionably assigned to the corporation is pending in the top court.

Sustained Harassment

After they started to actively protest the redevelopment, protesters and community members state they have been faced an extended period of pressure and threats – comprising communications, direct threats and insinuations that criticizing the initiative was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by figures they claim represent the business conglomerate.

Part of the group accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c