Skip to content
Saturday, October 10, 2026
RapidJournal

The Worst Games of This Year, According to Aggregate Scores

Across the internet, enthusiasts are eagerly sharing their lists of the greatest releases of 2025. But what about the stinkers, the failures? Let's take a few moments to recognize the most panned games of the year, based on the aggregate scores from Metacritic. Are all of these games truly as terrible as the ratings suggest? Here is the list.

10. Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour

Aggregate Score: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

First impressions to this pack-in experience were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many voicing frustration it wasn't a complimentary title like similar console launches. Reviewer sentiment varied dramatically, from "crushing disappointment" to more generous appraisals that highlighted the delightful software underneath the controversy. In spite of the controversy, the title proved to be a notable digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Marketed as "not just a racing game," this driving sim from studios in Germany and Poland received pretty unanimous reviews. Reviews pointed out that the game felt unfinished in nearly every way, notably in a year featuring stellar racing titles. Ultimately, this sputtering stinker was advised to be left unplayed.

8. Bubsy's Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

Before we start: the confusing title grammar is a silly strike against it. This anthology of retro platforming games features a sarcastic feline known for constant quips. Reviewers noted that these games were not good to begin with and haven't gotten better with age. The notably positive user score remains a curious contrast to the professional reviews.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Metascore: 53, User Score: 3.5

This anime-inspired fighter was met with widespread disappointment from both critics and the dedicated community. It was lambasted for a small character selection and a minimal offering of features. User reviews was particularly negative, with some voicing a desire that the title's flop would be a warning for similar releases.

6. Neptunia Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

A part of the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this vehicle combat game tasks players with rounding up cute monsters. The assessment was that its attempt to channel a rolling-collection gameplay loop was unsuccessful, coming across as more of a quick spin-off than a meaningful Neptunia game. Its brief runtime combined with a $40 price tag was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a curious artifact from the mid-2000s, finally released after years and years in production delays. The team behind it made the decision to keep the game as an authentic artifact of its time, fully aware that modern gamers might not appreciate its dated design. As such, many reviews noted that the tale of its development was far richer than the game itself.

4. Salvation

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-styled roguelike shooter drawing from games like *Returnal* fell flat with critics. Common complaints included repetitive adversaries, monotonous stage design, and a snoozy narrative. A controversial mechanic involving the protagonist's clothing was seen as adding nothing and detracted from the game's overall experience.

3. Ambulance Life

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Think of the tense surgery games of the past, then remove the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Players found the ambulance-driving sequences to be tedious and repetitive, and the narrative's handling of serious themes was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed largely unsatisfying.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Metascore: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This departure from the classic virtual pet formula makes the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, based on critics, was a vapid collection of basic activities that very soon grew tiresome. Some reviews went so far as to call it one of the most disappointing titles available on its platform, noting a profound lack of depth.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Intended to be a blockbuster crime saga from a studio led by industry veterans, *MindsEye* was a spectacular disappointment. Reviews universally panned its weak action, boring plot, and a host of technical problems. Critics found it to be a downgrade compared to previous-generation games in the same genre. Amidst the overwhelming criticism, a tiny number of optimistic players found fun in the experience, serving as a distinct counterpoint.

About the author

Donald James

Elara is a software engineer and tech writer with over a decade of experience in AI and web development, passionate about simplifying complex concepts.

RapidJournal

Type to search articles.